Showing posts with label political sleaze. Show all posts
Showing posts with label political sleaze. Show all posts

Tuesday, 23 March 2010

MPs breached parliamentary regulations on more than 400 occasions

BBC news are reporting that

More than 20 MPs broke rules on declaring hospitality in questions or debates after visiting locations such as the Maldives, Cyprus and Gibraltar.


The former Commissioner for Standards in Public Life, Sir Alistair Graham,told the corporation that

Between them, the MPs - from all the major parties - breached parliamentary regulations on more than 400 occasions.

Tuesday, 26 May 2009

Inspired by Abe


Our political leaders should take a leaf out of Abraham Lincoln's books in the current crisis in our politics.

Jon Snow is at the Hay festival along it seems with the intelligentsia of the country.

Taking inspiration from Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln he writes that


Lincoln inherited an America bankrupted and divided by his predecessor James Buchanan (who until recent times held the unchallenged reputation as America’s worst president ever). Lincoln himself had a difficult wife and a 10-year-old son who died whilst he was in the White House.
Yet he managed to rebuild the economy, end the civil war, end slavery, and restore the reputation of politics in America in the five years before he was eventually shot dead in the theatre down the road from the White House.

Saturday, 9 May 2009

Pigs in a trough- a round up


Having been out of circulation yesterday I missed out on the explosion in the blogosphere of comments about the expenses revelations.

Quite why Parliament now thinks that it is necessary to have an enquiry over who leaked the information is quite beyond me and will only add to the public's revulsion over the swathes of information hitting the headlines of which there will surely be more.

Here though are some of the comments that I have noted

The fate of nations, of monarchs and of the British people have been sealed in the Commons.
Yet now the reputation of the mother of all parliaments has been brought low by rules written and exploited here by claims for a kitkat, a tin of pet food and a bottle of shampoo... for TVs, furnishings and mortgages for the second homes of those who represent us.
says Nick Robinson

James Forsyth on Coffee House gets it spot on

I suspect that the story about Brown paying his brother £6,000 for cleaning services could be as damaging to the Prime Minister outside the Westminster Village as the McBride story was to him inside. One of the few remaining things Brown had going for him was the idea that whatever you thought of him he didn’t appear to be a politician on the make and on the take. Headlines about paying his brother £6,000 for cleaning blow away the image of him as a frugal Son of the Manse. It makes him appear just as bad as the rest of them.


Iain Dale who after ploughing through all the information says

You get the impression with one or two of the Cabinet Ministers that a story has been manufactured out of very little. But for most of them, there are questions which need to be answered, and I am afraid that the stock answer of "It was approved by the Fees Office" or "It's within the rules" is simply not good enough.


Guido who notes that

Clegg and Cameron seem quiet today don’t they? The usual attack dogs seem strangely muzzled. Chris Grayling isn’t growling. Norman Baker isn’t barking into broadcaster’s microphones. Wonder why? Could it be because no matter what their party, they are all at it?


The rumours incidentally are that the next installment will feature the shadow cabinet,possibly on Monday

Iain Martin says that

Members of Parliament have only themselves to blame for all this. They should have realised years ago that the game was up. From the moment in the early 1990s that sleaze scandals relating to the behaviour of MPs broke, they should have been on notice that anything they did that was less than honourable would out in the end.


Harriet Harman has it right when she says that people are angry - and that people are probably right to be angry - despite the fact that n one of these MPs were breaking any actual rules. says Susan Press

Paul Waugh reminds us that

none of this would have come to light without the tireless work of freedom of information campaigner Heather Brooke. Heather fought for 4 years to get the ruling that eventually resulted the receipts being gathered for publication. MPs and the Commons and the Speaker fought tooth and nail to stymie her.Three cheers for Heather - she puts some hacks to shame.


Bagehot who writes that

The various scams and ruses documented in the Telegraph aren't really corruption, at least not in the worst sense; they don't involve ministers taking money that influences their decisions, or to turn a blind eye, etc. They are more akin to theft. But they will still, I expect, be very damaging.
but adds that

Financial sleaze always looks worse for Labour politicians in a way, because they sell themselves more on their noble motives than the Tories.

Sunday, 29 March 2009

What were they thinking of?

The latest revelations about the Home Secretary Jacqui Smith in this morning's Mail on Sunday may well be a gaffe too far for the Prime Minister.
Hot on the heels of the second home controversy her husband claiming expenses for porn films is surely the height of stupidity.
One would like to be a fly on the wall in their residence this morning.

She is already the cabinet mnnister with the slimmest majority as Mike Smithson points out here,her seat is under threat at the next election

Peter Hoskin describes the news as unbelievable at Coffee House

It would be amusing - in a Frankie Howerd, "Titter ye not" kind of way - were it not such a mockery of the taxpayer.


The writing ,one feels, is on the wall

Monday, 23 March 2009

Time to abolish the second homes allowance

It was only a matter of time before a formal complaint was handed into Parliament over the Tony McNulty second homes affair which featured in yesterday's Sunday Mail.

It has been handed in by Tory MP Greg Hands to the parliamentary commissioner for standards over the allegations that McNulty has claimed £60,000 for a house in his constituency occupied by his parents.

The solution to all this is surely to abolish this practice once and for all a policy apparently advocated by Alan Duncan on the Today programme who favours rolling these allowances into salary.

Monday, 9 February 2009

Send the Home Secretary to jail


Peter Oborne makes his views on Jacqui Smith's second home fairly plain in the Mail this morning.

She is no more than a common thief he maintains.

it is little more than a common scam
he says adding that

if any of the civil servants who work under Jacqui Smith were caught trying the same stunt, they'd be arrested and sent to jail. So would any of the policemen under her charge.


Whilst I would not quite go the extremes of the Mail,Smith has once again made a grave misjudgement,especially at this time of economic hardship and the current arguments about bank bonuses.

She has of course done nothing legally wrong but morally it is incorrect.Labour has enough on its plate

Tuesday, 27 January 2009

This scandal is a version of the dying days of Major

Many people are comparing the scandal in the Lords to the dying days of the last Tory government which was covered in political sleaze and scandal.

Writing in the Guardian this morning George Monbiot agrees saying that

the circle is closed. The government that won a landslide in 1997 after
Tory MPs were revealed to have taken cash for parliamentary questions now faces
far graver allegations: cash for laws. Along the way, almost every policy that
distinguished it from John Major's corrupt and pointless regime has been
abandoned


And if the Sun captures the public mood then look no further than Fergus Shanahan who writes that

Why should we be surprised that Labour lords are renting themselves out like tarts on a street corner?
Decent behaviour at Westminster has been replaced by the morality of the brothel. Never mind arresting innocent Tories, shouldn’t Scotland Yard investigate Labour corruption?

Sunday, 25 January 2009

Scandal-Labour lords taking money for favours


It is rather nice to wake up to a bit of political scandal and this morning's Sunday Times returns to the old fashioned skill of undercover reporting.

Journalists from the paper,cunningly disguised as lobbyists have revealed that certain Labour peers have been willing to take cash in return for amending laws on behalf of business clients.

The peers have been named as Lord's Truscott,Taylor,Moonie and Snape.
I would imagine that Labour boffins waking up to this news need this story like a hole in the head

Wednesday, 22 October 2008

Mandleson the cluster bomb turns his attention to the Tories


Some profound words from Martin Bright over at his New Statesman blog

Lord Mandelson is like a political cluster bomb. Since he arrived back in Britain less than a month ago he has shown that he has lost none of his ability to attract the most explosive controversy. But his years in Brussels appear to have brought a new edge. With previous scandals, over his home loan from the then Labour paymaster general, Geoffrey Robinson, or his troubled relationship with the Indian billionaires the Hinduja brothers, he was content to bring only his own party into disrepute. This time his activities look set to drag in the opposition as well
.

Could have put it better myself

On the Osborne affair

I didn't get a chance to comment on the George Osborne saga yesterday,maybe a day to reflect on the menacing clouds may not have been a bad move.

I agree with John Redwood's simple synopsis

What a fuss about nothing. If the Conservatives had taken money from a British company (legal) as a conduit for money from an overseas resident (illegal) that would have been an interesting story and a complex web to untangle


Unfortunately with the media spotlight on him,it was never going to be as simple as that.

Regardless of the ins and outs of the story,it shows a lack of judgement by someone who could potentially in a couple of years be a holder of one of the great political offices of state.

A desire to be seen on the yacht of a Russian billionaire seems to have got in the way of political ambition.

Likewise his laying of a poison trap for Peter Mandleson has backfired and he has obviously lost a good friend in Nathaniel Rothschild in betraying a mutual friend.

Is this a resigning issue? A good question.It shouldn't be but I just wonder whether the media frenzy might turn it into one.

One thing it does once again highlight though is the need to move to state funding for the political parties with spending limits.This would prevent politicians in the future from getting embroiled in any future allegations

Sunday, 12 October 2008

Will the Ecclestone affair come back to haunt Labour?


It will be interesting to see how tis story develops as the day moves on.

This morning's Sunday Telegraph has looked back at events of 10 years ago as the first sleeze scandal hit New Labour.
Using Freedom of Information legislation to look at the Ecclestone affiar the paper reveals that

Tony Blair personally intervened to secure Formula One's exemption from the tobacco advertising ban just hours after meeting Bernie Ecclestone, the motorsport's billionaire boss


The revelation says the paper

casts doubt on the version of events given by officials both to Parliament and to lobby journalists when the sleaze scandal first broke in 1997. The documents also show that civil servants believed draft statements on the affair, which were about to be made public, were "disingenuous

Monday, 28 July 2008

Conway to pay back £1k a month

According to this morning's Mirror,the Tory MP Derek Conway has been given a year to pay back the monies that he paid to his son.

You may remember that Son Freddie was paid £13,000 as a researcher even though it was revealed that he did no work.

Conway found the Tory Whip removed from him and will be stepping down at the next election.

However the paper says,MP's have been kind

But Commons officials are letting the MP repay the cash in 12 instalments of £1,096 taken from his monthly pay.
The easy repayment terms, only made public after a long battle with the Parliamentary authorities, has led to fresh anger.


And remember there is still the small matter of £32,000 that he paid to his other son

Sunday, 29 June 2008

More Sleaze,more problems for Brown and for Jacqui Smith

Another Sunday morning and more problems for Gordon Brown.Many of the papers saying that he will plunged into crisis over the resignatio of Wendy Alexander and the forhcoming by election in Glasgow East but it doesn't end there.

The Sunday Times carries a report on its front page that Labour's Donors are falling out of favour with the party,according to the paper


Key donors who bankrolled new Labour are now reluctant to support Brown, claiming he lacks the qualities required to salvage the party’s fortunes.
— The millionaire businessman Sir Maurice Hatter, who has donated more than £176,000 to the party since 2001, said it was time for a change of leader.
“He hasn’t got the charisma,” he said. “He was a good number two, but he is not a number one. I just don’t think he is a prime minister.”


The Observer meanwhile focuses on problems for the Home Secretary

The home secretary is at the centre of the worst race row to engulf the police service for almost a decade as chief constables stand accused of blocking an inquiry into discrimination against Muslim officers.
Jacqui Smith will be asked to intervene tomorrow after the damning revelation that at least 20 police forces refused to co-operate with the first audit into the treatment of Muslim and black officers. Information from those forces that did take part suggested there was routine racial discrimination against them.


The Mail meanwhile discovers another political sleaze story claiming that

More than 100 MPs are using their expenses to commit a multi-million-pound tax dodge, it was claimed last night.
They are accused of using huge sums in parliamentary allowances to fund a second home while telling HM Revenue & Customs that it is in fact their main home.
Because MPs' second homes are usually in London, where property is more expensive, they can avoid massive capital gains tax bills by nominating the second home as their main home, because main homes are exempt from the tax.

Tuesday, 10 June 2008

The Tory Press fights back


The Telegraph is reporting that a Labour MEP is now in trouble over papyments of allowences.

Michael Cashman, a leading Labour MEP, has paid his boyfriend more than 8,000 pounds a month from his taxpayer-funded expenses, the Telegraph can disclose.adding

Documents show that Paul Cottingham was given secretarial allowances worth £8,143 a month to administer in 2002. This was the maximum allowance available at the time. Euro-MPs can now receive an allowance for staff of £160,000 a year.
Mr Cashman says that he currently pays his civil partner an annual salary of £30,000 inclusive of expenses. However, he has so far not disclosed how the rest of the allowance is distributed after being given to Mr Cottingham. It is known he employs at least one other Brussels-based assistant.

Monday, 9 June 2008

Dorries throws down the gauntlet


One Tory MP and blogger Nadine Dorries has laid down the gauntlet for those attacking Caroline Spelman this morning.

The frenzied attack against Conservative MPs and MEPs, orchestrated by and emanating from the left wing BBC and press has equalled that of an animal in its death throes. The more terminal the position looks for Labour, the more desperate the BBC and left wing press become
she says adding

My daughter Jenny, who is 20, begins work for me this week for six weeks as a paid intern.
She told me I shouldn’t put what she earns on the blog as it is against her human rights. I told her that as an MP's daughter, she doesn’t have any. She is being paid £7.50 per hour.
She has superb computer skills and one of her first jobs will be to start working through a packing case of letters, cards and emails received following the abortion vote along with the full in tray ready and waiting on her desk.
If Michael Crick or any other journalist would like to check it out she is working from my staff office, just be our guest.

Saturday, 7 June 2008

Spelman takes advantage of the nanny state

The Tory sleaze scandal continues to rumble.

Now come reports that Party chairman Caroline Spelman is to face a Parliamentary inquiry into claims that she paid her nanny to act as her constituency secretary.

The story broke last night on Newsnight which tracked down the former nanny Tina Haynes who said that she had done no secretarial work other that answering the phone a couple of times a week.

Although this took place 11 years ago,it rounds off a bad week for David Cameron after the problems of Den Dover and Giles Chichester

Friday, 6 June 2008

Two down now.


Tory MEP Den Dover,the chief whip in Brussels has been sacked

Conservative Home reports

Philip Bushill-Matthews MEP, until yesterday Giles Chichester's Deputy and now acting leader of the Tory delegation to the European Parliament, has replaced Den Dover MEP with Richard Ashworth MEP as Chief Whip. Mr Dover is facing his own ethical questions but is protesting his innocence.


Meanwhile David Cameron is to send the enforcer to Brussels.In a release from CCHQ

On David Cameron’s instructions the Conservative Party’s new Head of Compliance, Hugh Thomas, will be sent to Brussels next week. His visit will have two purposes:
To reinforce the importance of the existing guidelines on MEP allowances announced in April, and to establish arrangements for regular publication of a breakdown of allowances on an equivalent basis to Members of Parliament.
Assess the efficiency of their current reporting procedures around expenses and office costs.
Hugh Thomas will also assess if further steps need to be taken before reporting back to David Cameron.





So that's the leader of the party and now the chief whip.

Chichester goes and maybe more on the way


The latest political sleaze is dominating the conversation today.

For anyone that has missed the news,Tory MEP Giles Chichester,under pressure from his party leader,was forced into resigning his post over expense claims totally nearly half a million pounds.

It emerged that over a period of 12 years he has transfer ed funds from his expense account to a company of which he is a director.He claimed that he was unaware of the rule.

How this affair will rebound on David Cameron is unclear,but for the second time,following the Conway affair,a Tory politician has been forced to resign over sleaze allegations.Cameron was quick to force the issue yesterday.

Adam Boulton claims

David Cameron is a lucky politician: the resignation of the leader of the Tories' MEPs in a financial scandal coincided, very conveniently, with the seizure of British diplomats by Robert Mugabe's thugs in Zimbabwe.
For once, you might say the Conservatives have something to be grateful to Mugabe for. A good day to bury bad news, you might also say.
and

Embarrassingly, Chichester was the person ordered by Cameron after the Derek Conway scandal at Westminster to make sure Tory MEPs' finances were all ship shape.


Guido meanwhile claims

there are still, right now, 13 Tory MEPs who refuse to disclose what they have done with their expenses. Den Dover has a very similar set-up to Chichester, with hundreds of thousands of pounds paid to a family firm based in his home, he has a lot of questions to answer.
and is currently looking in the affairs of another MEP.

Watch this space

Friday, 14 March 2008

Why not a Matalan list?


The credibilty of Parliament and MP's has onec again come under attack over the John Lewis list revelations.Released under the Freedom of information act,the list, given as a guide to what members of Parliament can claim for redecorating second homes and domestic expenses, has produced condemnation from all areas.

How Parliament could ever of thought that the public would expect a shop better known for its wedding gift lists to be the bench mark for claims expenses seems far fetched.

Alan Cochrane writes that

Most people who've covered the House of Commons over the years have known about - but generally kept quiet about - the tidy sum that MPs were making through having their second homes in London effectively paid for by the taxpayer


Red Box describes

It was named such, because staff used the John Lewis website as their guide to "reasonsable prices". Rather than Matalan.


Meanwhile this could only be the start,Nick Robinson reports that

The detailed expenses of every Member of Parliament are likely to be made public for the first time. An all party committee chaired by the Speaker looks set to recommend that the claims made by MPs over the past three years should be published later this year.


How many more revelations are we going to get and how much further down our esteem list is Parliament going to fall?

Sunday, 10 February 2008

So what do you get for 20 grand?

£20,OOO appears a popular figure today as a sum that a number of politicans have been accused of as squandering.

Read this morning's Indy and it is David Davis,Tory Shadow Home Secretary who

faces the prospect of an Electoral Commission inquiry over a substantial donation that passed through several hands and was declared by four people, including Derek Conway
.

In the Sunday Times,it is the rising star of the cabinet James Purnell who

bought a flat in London before becoming an MP and his Manchester constituency home, which he acquired several years later. He was able to claim thousands of pounds of MPs’ expenses on the London home and is accused of exploiting a tax loophole to avoid a huge bill on its sale.


Whilst turn to the pages of the Telegraph and it is senior Tory Michael Ancram who

claimed more than £20,000 in housing expenses last year, explaining that he had to paint his property and remove moss from the garden.


Game set and match?