The Economist's Bagehot takes a look at the dilema that the party has over whether to
cultivate a strategic ambiguity, saying they will only be able to reveal detailed policies on taxing and spending after a victorious election, when they see the books.
and thinks this is not sensible for two reasons.
1.Labour will portray such an opaque stance as an omen of brutal Tory cuts and
2.that they have already offered some specifics. These make it very difficult to stick to the ambiguity formula without looking shifty and imbalanced. adding that
The options therefore may be to scrap the existing pledges, or provide some more clarity on medium-term policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment